While the impending shut down of the NewPage paper mill in Port Hawksbury will cause significant economic disruption, especially in the Straits area, the situation should be viewed by the Provincial Government as an opportunity to begin promoting transition to a new, sustainable approach to use of Nova Scotia’s forest resources.
Some Background and Some Facts
First, some facts about the power rate situation. Yes, electricity prices are rising in Nova Scotia, as they are in virtually every other jurisdiction in the world which relies on hydrocarbons as the primary fuel for electricity generation. But, no, even with proposed increases, industrial power rates in Nova Scotia will not be significantly higher than in other areas with a similar generation mix.
Indeed, existing industrial power rates in New Brunswick, Ontario, Maine, Michigan and Wisconsin – all jurisdictions with significant forest products industries and forest industries closures – already exceed rates requested but not yet approved in Nova Scotia. And rates in many other jurisdictions are higher still.
Second, some facts about markets for paper produced at Port Hawksbury. Demand for newsprint in North America today has declined by more than 60% from levels that prevailed as recently as 2005. Demand for supercalendared paper has also declined significantly, though not as precipitously as for newsprint.
Market prices for both types of paper have also declined over the past several years and are widely recognised in the industry to be at or below cost of production. And for Port Hawksbury, the changing relative values of the Canadian and US Dollars has represented a double hit –a decline of 33% in the US Dollar market price for paper over the same period as the Canadian Dollar has increased from roughly USD 0.80 to slightly above parity represents about a 50% effective price drop for the Port Hawksbury mill in Canadian Dollars. Multiplied by 600,000 tonnes of output, the effective Canadian Dollar revenue decline is dramatic.
The challenges faced by NewPage in Port Hawksbury, as well as by AbitibiBowater in Liverpool, reflect fundamental transformation of global forest products markets, and cannot be resolved through artificially reduced power rates and what would amount to effective subsidisation by other rate payers.
(In the interests of full disclosure, it should be noted that over recent years Halifax Global has advised both the Nova Scotia Government and Nova Scotia Power on issues related to comparative energy costs and forest sector competitiveness.)
Towards a New Forest Products Value Proposition
A sustainable value proposition for Nova Scotia’s forest industries will likely be found in a combination of processing technologies and product streams that capture value from the widest possible range of properties of current and future forest resources. Lumber and pulp and paper may continue to be part of the mix, but with North American lumber production having declined almost 50% since 2005, and demand for paper declining as well, these segments will likely become a reduced portion of the overall sector.
New industries need to be considered as part of Nova Scotia’s future forest sector. Examples can include biochemical extraction and processing of the hemicelluloses (sugars) in woody biomass to facilitate production of five and six carbon sugars which can be fermented and processed into advanced biofuels, biopolymers and other products The cellulose fibre and lignin that remain after such processes also exhibit enhanced unit energy values and can be used for production of sustainable, renewable bioenergy.
Development of an agro-forestry industry to produce purpose-grown bioenergy crops, (eg. willow, miscanthus, reed canarygrass, switchgrass), has potential as part of the future forest sector. Cultivation of such crops can offer the agriculture sector potential new cash crops; and, applicability of completely mechanised planting and harvesting processes can ensure predictable and lower costs than conventional forest harvesting.
A sustainable future forest sector in Nova Scotia will need to include a combination of outputs that generate sufficient value to ensure viability for all product streams, whether conventional or alternative. As hydrocarbon costs continue to rise – and they will – we need to look to a wide range of forest and agro-forestry opportunities to achieve sustainable value and energy relationships based on our renewable resources.
In 2009 Chris Hornberger and I undertook a project with novaknowledge to develop a report card on the health, safety and return to work record in Nova Scotia. This report dealt with a full range of health and safety issues and outcomes including obesity, cancer, absenteeism, mental health, workplace injury time loss claims and time to return to work following an injury.
One of the key findings from the report was that 63% of Nova Scotia’s working age population carry excess weight (the second highest rate in the country) and that excess weight has been shown to lead to increased levels of diabetes, cancer and workplace injury. With increased costs of health care delivery, recent media coverage has focused on obesity and the impact it has on our healthcare budgets. What has been missing from this conversation is the impact obesity has on the prosperity of our province.
Obesity is a symptom with many causes. When compared to the national averages our population is less physically active, fewer of us eat fruits and vegetables five times a day, more of us have unhealthy alcohol consumption patterns, and more of us smoke. Reversing the obesity trend will mean addressing all of these factors and we all have a role to play.
- Employers need to create work environments where healthy behaviours are recognized and supported – this can be as simple as encouraging employees to go for a walk on their lunch break or as complex as providing health assessments and tools for improving health outcomes for their entire workforce.
- Unions need to reinforce healthy behaviours and support the inclusion of health related clauses in negotiated contracts.
- Educators need to integrate wellness programs into schools – not just removing junk food from cafeterias, but teaching students about living a healthy lifestyle now and for their entire lives, including the reintroduction of physical activity on a daily basis.
- Community organizations need to inspire community leaders to effect change through support of healthy living initiatives and activities – the maintenance of parks and venues for outdoor activities; serving healthy food at community meetings and events; and recognizing employers who are making positive changes in their workplaces.
- Governments need to provide the policy framework and infrastructure to promote health living. These may include taxing overly fat, salty or sweet foods, making our communities more pedestrian and bicycle friendly, and supporting healthy living initiatives.
- Individuals need to take responsibility for their own health and take steps to improve their health and that of their families – join a gym (and go); walk with a friend; and eat more fruits and vegetables.
This won’t be easy – change is a very difficult thing. It takes leadership, legislation, communication and education; but we have had some success in the recent past that show we can adapt to new ways of living and working.
Over the past 30 years smoking has become something you do alone, outside, where your smoke won’t harm anyone else – a far cry from when I went to university and smoking in class was the norm. Recycling is something we do as a matter of course – but 15 years ago we wouldn’t have dreamt of sorting our garbage for the good of the environment. And most recently, we all learned to cough into our sleeves rather than our hands in order to reduce the spread of germs and infectious diseases. So we can change.
Through researching the material for this report I recognized that I had some unhealthy practices that needed to change – I joined a gym and go at least twice a week; I’ve started to practice yoga; I walk my dog at least once a day; and I try to eat five servings of fruit and vegetables every day. These weren’t big changes, but they did take making a conscious decision to improve my health and that of my family, and I am seeing improvements.
If it takes a community to raise a child then it definitely takes a community to improve our collective health outcomes. We all have a role to play, we just need to make the decision that we need to change – for ourselves, our families and our community – and then just do it.
Using wood to generate energy is not a new concept. Man has used wood for heat and light since the beginning of time. Forest products manufacturers have also been using wood fibre to generate heat and electricity for many decades.
So, why have proposed projects to use biomass to generate electricity proved to be so challenging?
Historic Value Relationships Changing
Traditionally, combined heat and power generation — cogeneration – at forest products manufacturing plants has relied on an economic balance that has prevailed for most of the past century. As an outcome of the harvesting and processing of trees into lumber or other wood products, into wood chips that become pulp furnish or roundwood that also becomes pulp furnish, bark and other residuals become feedstock for energy generation.
The key to viability is that the overall balance of total use and conversion of harvested material into some combination of wood, pulp and paper products and energy was maintained.
The economic reality of this relationship has been that most of the cost of harvesting and processing has been absorbed by higher value products – lumber, pulp, paper – with the result that remaining residuals became low cost feedstock for heat and power production, also mostly used in process. But even in situations in which surplus heat and power could be sold to other users or the grid, the low cost of the residual feedstock created a viable economic relationship for the energy producing facility.
Financial Markets Crash and US Recession Have Changed Value Relationship
Most important have been changes in US demand for housing:
- Household formations in the US at historically low levels –
A recent US Census Bureau Report notes that between March 2009 and March 2010, the number of households rose by 357,000, the smallest increase since 1947. The previous year, households increased by only 398,000, the third smallest increase on record. These are steep drops from the 2002–07 period, when household increases averaged 1.3 million a year. This drop largely explains why the housing glut remains stubbornly high, despite decreases in housing starts.
- Housing starts remain at historic lows –
US Census Bureau data shows that housing starts in February, 2011 in the US were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 479,000, down more than 20% from February, 2010.
- Housing starts outpaced household formations for more than a decade –
US Census Bureau and Department of Commerce data show that new housing starts have exceeded the rate of household formations for more than ten years.Over the thirteen year period shown in the graph, the number of homes built by the US housing industry exceeded the number of households formed during the period by more than 3 million. Even after allowing for purchases of second vacation homes, replacement of destroyed and dilapidated housing and other normal replacement factors, it is clear that the US overbuilt housing by a significant margin. That excess inventory remains in the marketplace, much of it held by financial institutions through foreclosure activity.
- Declining home ownership lowers demand for wood products –
As reported in Random Lengths Yardstick publication, (September 2010), owner-occupied housing declined to 66.9% of the US housing mix, the third consecutive quarterly decline and well below the historical peak of 69.2% reached during the fourth quarter of 2004. This decline is linked directly to reduced demand for single family housing.
- Inventory of unsold homes in US continues to depress new home sales –
Economists at California’s Chapman University point out that with two million houses either on lender balance sheets or predicted to be headed there, it will take five years to absorb the inventory under normal economic conditions. High unemployment and consumer debt may extend that to eight to 10 years.
- Home foreclosures in US continue to dampen real estate demand –
According to a Congressional Oversight Panel report, approximately 250,000 new foreclosures are started every month, while 100,000 are completed. This has widespread impact, experts say, because foreclosures negatively affect neighbourhoods and drive down local real estate values, resulting in more cautious and less free spending consumers, further depressing the economy. The Panel estimates that up to 13 million foreclosures will have occurred by 2012 since its formation in 2008.
Changing Patterns of Demand for Paper Further Upset Industry Balance
The paper industry side of the value balance has also experienced disruptions.
North American demand for newsprint has decline by more than 60% since 2005 and close to seven million tonnes of production capacity has been permanently shut down or idled. Recent analysts reports indicate that even with recent price increases, most newsprint producers cannot achieve financial breakeven. Industry statements predict additional capacity reductions.
Demand for other printing papers has also declined, though more a result of reductions in economic activity rather than structural change.
Paper producers have also been affected by reductions in lumber demand, because closed sawmills don’t produce wood chips needed as pulp furnish. The result is that some mills have had to resort to whole tree chipping and face increased costs.
More Fundamental Changes Underway
Together, these changes in product demand have resulted in a 44% – 45% decline in softwood lumber production across North America since 2005. While that decline has been somewhat offset by recent increased sales to China and India by west coast producers, current levels of forest harvesting and lumber production in Central and Eastern Canada remain 50% – 60% below peak levels of 2005-06.
Additional downward pressure on demand for wood products may become permanent, as increasing energy costs appear to be driving other shifts US housing demand.
There is evidence of reductions in average home size for both single family and multi-unit dwellings, and of multi-unit buildings representing an increased share of total housing starts. It is premature to conclude these changes represent permanent shifts in demand, but if these trends become the norm, the result will be further reductions in demand for wood building products.
Bioenergy Production Requires New Value Relationship
Conventional forest products manufacturing and cogeneration has been viable because costs of harvesting, transport and processing were absorbed primarily by the higher valued products – wood products and pulp and paper. However, with the structural shifts in demand for those
products a new value balance is needed.
But, the question remains, what is the new, sustainable value relationship?
Single product streams such as wood pellets are unlikely to be viable. Electricity generation costs from pellets at current (May 2011) market prices are about 15 percent higher than costs of generating electricity from heavy fuel oil. Pellet prices need to be reduced by 30%, or heavy fuel oil increased by a similar amount, for conventional pellets to be competitive as an energy fuel.
What Might Be The New Value Relationship?
A sustainable economic relationship for biomass to bioenergy will likely be found in a combination of processing technologies and product streams that capture value from the widest possible range of properties of the feedstock, including in particular biochemical extraction. For example, extraction and processing of the hemicelluloses (sugars) in woody biomass facilitates production of five and six carbon sugars which can be fermented and processed into advanced biofuels, biopolymers and other products. The remaining cellulose fibre and lignin exhibit increased unit energy values and additional advantageous properties, such as becoming more hydrophobic than conventional pellets.
Purpose-grown bioenergy crops, (eg. willow, miscanthus, reed canarygrass, switchgrass), are also likely to become part of the long term sustainable feedstock mix. Cultivation of such crops offers the agriculture sector potential new cash crops; and, applicability of completely mechanised planting and harvesting processes can ensure predictable and lower costs than conventional forest harvesting.
Biomass technologies and projects for which proposed economics are based on naïve assumptions of conventional forest industries producing vast piles of unused waste materials will prove to be unviable – primarily because the ‘waste’ simply doesn’t exist. And, it certainly doesn’t exist at the close to zero cost frequently incorporated into such venture proposals.
What will prove viable and sustainable will be a combination of outputs that generate sufficient value to ensure reasonable feedstock costs for each product stream. As the cost of oil rises, achieving that new value relationship for biomass becomes easier. But, proponents seeking to develop new projects, whether greenfield or repurposing idled forest products facilities, should include multiple partners and technologies needed for a sustainable value relationship.
 “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009″, US Census Bureau, September, 2010, as reported by Global Insight
 As reported in Random Lengths Yardstick, March 2011 issue.
 Milstead, David, “No easy way for investors to bet on U.S. housing recovery”, The Globe and Mail, December 23rd, 2010
 Morgenson, Gretchen, “A Mortgage Nightmare’s Happy Ending”, New York Time, December 25th, 2010
 News release from the California Building Industry Association, December 22, 2010, as reported by RISI
A month ago, I wrote a blog article entitled “Egypt, Bahrain, the Middle East and Our Businesses”. I could now write an article entitled “Japan, Libya, the World and our Businesses”. However, I think I can safely leave the name of any country or region of the world out of the title for it is very clear that what happens around the globe has an impact on us – our families, communities and at the places where we work.
Global crisis and events impact our businesses/organizations and we must ensure that our decision making processes are nimble and appropriately responsive to change. We cannot afford to ignore the world around us as being outside of our control.
Role of business planning and intervention
Businesses can cope with global disruptive change through a robust planning process:
- Ensuring the organization’s vision encompasses the impact of the global environment;
- Understanding the exposure of a firm’s current marketplace position to international events and activities;
- Continuous assessment and monitoring of critical success drivers with regard to setting direction, working together and people;
- Monitoring those key performance indicators that are most sensitive to global change;
- Delegation of decision making authority so that appropriate actions are taken on a timely basis; and
- Where overall disruption is significant an action driven intervention process may be required, with:
- Leadership team engaged;
- Contingent operational plans;
- Budget review evaluation and possible amendments; and
- Monitoring processes.
Here are five global related items that have been impacting us and getting our attention of late along with some thoughts on how we could respond to, or counter, the impact on us.
1 – Fuel and Energy
Last month, I noted how the price of crude oil rose in January due to the uncertainty in Egypt and the remote possibility of disruption of shipments through the Suez Canal. Look at the price of oil now following the Libyan conflagration. Your organization is paying more for transportation now and energy prices will be moving upwards as well.
The disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has governments around the world reassessing their plans to maintain and build additional nuclear energy capacity which could increase reliance on fossil fuels with long term repercussions on both price and energy security here on Canada’s East Coast. What will be the impact of the disaster on the refurbishment costs and timing, to say nothing about the community acceptance, of the reinstatement of Point Lepreau into the energy grid in New Brunswick?
What to do?
Short term, we could consider implementing fuel surcharges on our existing contracts where meaningful and acceptable and, over the medium term, we should write contracts with surcharge provisions or other pricing mechanisms. Over the long term, we must be looking for alternate energy sources for our businesses either directly or by supporting such initiatives from energy providers.
2 – Global Supply Chains – logistics
There have been negative impacts on global supply chains. I spoke with a local manufacturer last week and this firm is experiencing significant delays in receiving electronic components. Another local company, Scanwood Canada Inc., is in the midst of bankruptcy protection but what recently caused a temporary shut-down was the fact that components were held up due to transportation logistics.
What to do?
Your customers expect prompt delivery of products and services and the failure of your supply chain to deliver product to you can have direct negative consequences. Planning for disruption requires relationship management so that your needs are met whenever possible. You should also built a robust, multiple supplier network ensuring security of supply in anticipation, however slight, of delivery failure from current vendors.
3 – Military Operations
To quote from my earlier blog “Continued unrest in the Middle East may well require support or response from Maritime Forces Atlantic that could well see the deployment of ships and personnel into the region.” Not only is the HMCS Charlottetown positioned off of the coast of Africa but the Canadian military now has six CF-18 Hornets and crew in Italy and these aircraft are currently being deployed in the skies over Libya.
What to do?
The populace of this region and, in particular, this city has been aligned with the military for centuries and I am proud to be a Nova Scotia Director for the Canadian Forces Liaison Council. Your organization should proactively support the Canadian Forces Reserves.
On March 30, 2011, the CFLC Nova Scotia Provincial Council is planning an awards ceremony to recognize ten Nova Scotia organizations that have provided excellent support to their reservist employees or students. Her Honour, the Honourable Mayann E. Francis, Lieutenant Governor of Nova Scotia, will preside over the ceremony and present these awards.
4 – Our Employees and Families
For a week in February, the local press followed the story of Glenn Sutherland and his family, from the time he was forced to flee from an oil rig site in Libya until he reached Malta and finally arrived safe and sound back in Nova Scotia. Glenn was working for Suncor Energy Inc, a Canadian company with operations in Libya.
My daughter and grandson live in a coastal community on the Big Island, Hawaii. On March 11, 2011 our daughter called advising us that they were under a tsunami alert and they had gone to higher ground and were waiting ….. Thankfully, they were fine as it was a non-event for them but now we worry about radiation and the recently resurgent Kilauea volcano that is only a few kilometers away.
What to do?
We must be empathetic as a community and as employers. We have family, friends and employees that have been touched by any one of a number of recent global events. Virtually every organization that I have worked with acknowledges that their employees are their vital assets. Now is the time to ensure that we support those employees who have family members impacted by global catastrophes including those who are serving with Canadian Forces abroad. Such support could be coverage/stories in internal communications, time off as required and counseling where appropriate
5 – Global Economic Recovery in Peril
The global turmoil is creating additional uncertainty in both domestic and international marketplaces and is undermining the rather fragile economic recovery that we have been experiencing in the past 12 months. We have seen a rise in protectionism as some countries try to shield their economies, and this is stifling market opportunity for Canadian exporters.
What to do?
A stall in the recovery does not have to translate into a stall in revenue streams with the right preparation and adoption of risk mitigation activities, such as:
- Optimized pricing strategies that may require decreases or increases to meet marketplace requirements. Or what may be required is a realignment of how products and services are priced to best match value in customers’ eyes.
- Multiple volume strategies:
- Existing clients;
- New clients same markets;
- New market segments; and
- Alternative international markets.
Is there an opportunity to cut costs – sure. The private sector has been doing this throughout the recession and governments are in the throes of trying to manage down horrendous deficits including cutting funding to the post-secondary education sector and all organizations that receive government support.
One cost lever that requires continuous monitoring and evaluation is managing the balance between fixed and variable costs, make or buy locally or import. The context changes constantly, as revenue and activity mix ebbs and flows and the critical mass required to support continued investment increases or decreases. For example:
- Exporters – international direct sales force vs. channel; or
- Currency hedging strategies including the matching of foreign purchases to sales.
Nimble and timely response to fast paced global change is a receipt for success. When the economic tsunami threatens our businesses can brace for it, scramble for higher ground or implement contingency plans at the earliest possible moment.
This post is prompted by a column in the February 24th, 2011 Chronicle-Herald by Peter Halpin, Executive Director of the Atlantic Association of Universities — www.thechronicleherald.ca/Letters/1229890.html — which challenges the perspective of the Halifax Chamber of Commerce on the role of universities in our local and regional economy.
While I share some of the AAU’s concerns, I will also respectfully submit that basing a criticism of the Chamber’s Outlook 2011 document on the key findings of an economic impact study is not an argument that leads from strength. More about that below, but for those interested in knowing more about just how important universities are to our economy, the full study, as well as summary versions and other related policy papers can be found at this link — www.atlanticuniversities.ca/AbsPage.aspx?siteid=1&lang=1&id=6
I also share some of the concerns the Chamber articulates in its description of education as an ‘Issue’, but suggest as well that as an argument for change, this position too does not lead from strength. More about that below as well, but for those interested, the full details of the Chamber’s Outlook report can be found at the following link — www.halifaxchamber.com/files/15/88/BVoutlook2011.pdf
The Sacred Cow Perspective
The Chamber’s Outlook 2011 Report addresses education in the ‘issues’ section, not in the industries section. Specifically with regard to universities, the Chamber seems to adopt the views of Dr. Tim O’Neill, (expressed in his report to the Premier), with regard to the market challenges of declining university-age population, [within the region], suggesting the “province may not be able to support as many institutions as it has and that smaller niche schools may have to look to their larger cousins for opportunities to cooperate or even merge”. The Chamber document goes on to state that the number, role and position of universities in Nova Scotia needs to be viewed within the context of the “ongoing discussion about the size and cost of government” and examined along with “other government expenditures”. The Chamber calls on the universities to do a better job of explaining the value they bring to our economy and our society and notes that if an acceptable [to whom?] argument can’t be made, “then we need to cast a critical eye on them”.
In its Outlook report, the Chamber seems to imply that universities are simply another government expenditure, like health care, roads or social assistance. This view does not reflect the sources of revenues and range of economic activity of our universities.
To illustrate, there are currently almost 17,000 students enrolled at Dalhousie — more than half these students come from outside Nova Scotia, representing significant incremental ‘export earnings’ for the province. And, it should be noted, proportionately Dal is neither the most internationally nor the most externally focussed institution in the province. Within the Halifax area, both St. Mary’s and Mount Saint Vincent attract significant numbers of international students.
On the research front, Dalhousie’s total funded research activity this year will approach $150 million — more than two-thirds of which originates from sources other than the Nova Scotia Government and the federal Tri-Council granting agencies. This too represents a form of ‘export earnings’ for Nova Scotia. And faculty at all post-secondary institutions in Nova Scotia — including the other universities and the Nova Scotia Community College and the Nova Scotia Agriculture College — actively pursue and engage in international research contracts and activities that generate incremental revenues to Nova Scotia. These international projects represent a valuable source of export earnings for both the institutions involved and the province and total, even with a relatively limited effort, roughly $10 – $15 million in export earnings annually.
Nonetheless, notwithstanding these acknowledged or unacknowledged strengths, Nova Scotia’s universities collectively and individually face significant strategic business and market challenges related to continuing declines in high school graduations within the region, as well as from declining public sector funding support that is also attributable to the demographic profile of our population.
The Strategic Assets Perspective
The AAU has cited a number of key points and facts about the economic impact of universities in Halifax. These need not be repeated here, except to note that the points raised and the full study from which these points are drawn clearly illustrate that universities constitute a signficant ‘industry’ in our local, provincial and regional economy.
The AAU’s argument relies on economic impact data that seems to say ‘we’re big and we’re important’, but the ‘Chamber is not showing us proper respect’. There may well be merit in that position but its weakness is that its founded on data that in effect says ‘here’s what you did for me yesterday’.
I don’t equate Nova Scotia’s universities with the auto sector, but for me the reliance on the economic impact data contains echoes of the ‘we’re too important to fail’ arguments put forward by General Motors and Chrysler as they faced the abyss of plummeting sales and crashing financial markets in late 2008 and early 2009. Over the years, those companies had invested in plants and facilities that they undoubtedly viewed as strategic assets at the time. But when assets are misaligned with market shifts, their strategic value diminishes markedly.
Economic impact data is inherently backward focused and provides no real linkage to future directions and opportunities. In particular, in the context of the substantive strategic business and market challenges faced by our universities, there is a need for articulation of how the institutions’ existing and developing asset base can serve to leverage new sources of revenue and growth.
Towards an Alternative, Strategic Perspective
Unfortunately, neither the sacred cow nor the strategic assets perspectives articulated by the Chamber and AAU respectively are particularly helpful in creating a strategic framework within which our universities can address identified business and market challenges and opportunities and chart new courses towards sustainable growth.
By most measures, the education and related research ‘product’ our institutions deliver is high quality and well regarded internationally. It also demonstrates strong market acceptance. Nova Scotia’s universities, indeed its entire post-secondary education sector is, in our view, a significant economic sector for Nova Scotia, with substantial potential for growth.
Some of that high potential future and growth is beginning to emerge –
- The impending launch of the Halifax Marine Research Institute and the related Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) in Ocean Science and Technology will represent a new benchmark for collaboration and engagement between multiple institutions, and the private and public sectors focused on a wide range of issues related to oceans — an area in which Nova Scotia has natural credibility and competitive strength;
- The imminent opening of the Innovacorp Enterprise Centre and the adjoining Life Sciences Research Institute will combine office and lab space with enhanced incubation capability that will contribute to the growth and success of new life sciences companies, many of which will be based on technologies developed at our universities; and,
- The Biomedical MRI Research Laboratory (BMRL) at Halifax’s IWK Health Centre, together with the Neuroimaging Research Laboratory (NRL) at the QE II Health Sciences Centre, represent effective collaborations between the universities, the hospitals, government and the private sector and enable life science companies in the Halifax region to pursue research and development, technology transfer and new product commercialization.
But significantly more is possible. Our universities and our P-12 education system are staffed by highly educated people with expertise that is in demand internationally. Nova Scotia’s academics and education professionals have significant, recognised expertise in areas related to curriculum development and delivery of education programming, coastal zone management, oceans, environmental management, community economic development, entrepreneurship and business management The annual global market for education-related services alone totals roughly $2 trillion; and opportunities in the other areas mentioned represent an annual market opportunity of another $500 million plus annually.
The AAU quotes Mike Harcourt, former Premier of British Columbia and former Mayor of Vancouver as recently telling Haligonians that “your universities provide the foundation and opportunity to move Halifax from good to great”. Note, however, his emphasis was very much on ‘foundation and opportunity’. He did not say that we are great, but rather that we could become great with effective leverage of the knowledge and expertise contained within our universities.
The knowledge and expertise contained within our education sector is one of Nova Scotia’s most effective strategic assets. But like all business assets, it needs to be leveraged and focused — on where markets are going tomorrow, not where they have been. Our universities, indeed all the institutions within our education sector employ people with skills, expertise and knowledge that is in demand and that can be sold globally. Through active and aggressive pursuit of global market opportunities combined with collaboration with each other and with private and other public sector partners, Nova Scotia’s and Atlantic Canada’s education institutions could become our most significant, knowledge-based export earners. In short, they could become great and be recognised by all, including the Chamber, as a substantial industry, not just an issue.
The upheaval started in January in Tunisia and by mid February not only has the leader of that country been ousted but also Mubarak in Egypt and this morning, February 17, the military in Bahrain has taken over that country’s capital. Protests and unrest are happening in a dozen other Middle Eastern countries. This has and will continue to have an impact on our businesses and on our employees!
Fuel and Energy
The price of crude oil rose in January due to the uncertainty in Egypt and the remote possibility of disruption of shipments through the Suez Canal. The price retreated following Mubarak’s departure but continued unrest in the region, especially amongst oil producers, could soon result in rapidly escalating prices that will quickly translate into higher transportation and energy costs in Atlantic Canada.
Egypt is the largest importer of wheat in the world and the supply side of the equation has been driving up prices due to weather related crop failures and protectionism by historic exporters such as Russia. Egypt must continue to feed its population and will purchase wheat on world markets but while Western Canada will benefit from increased prices and volumes of wheat sold, Atlantic Canadians will pay more for these goods and bread and other baked goods will continue to get more expensive.
The uninhibited flow of goods through the Suez Canal is vital to The Port of Halifax and its customers, suppliers and employees and any disruption would have negative implications for all of Atlantic Canada. Just after Mubarak’s departure Iran requested permission, for the first time in 30 years, for two military ships to pass through the Suez Canal. Israel quickly called this a provocation and the tension has lessened now that Iran has withdrawn the request.
Continued unrest in the Middle East may well require support or response from Maritime Forces Atlantic that could well see the deployment of ships and personnel into the region. This may well in turn necessitate the call up of reservists to enable the military missions.
Egypt has long been a tourism destination site but the influx of tourists to the region has dwindled considerably over the past month. While Atlantic Canadians may have to pick another destination outside of the Middle East over the short term the collapse of a significant source of revenue and employment will have major economic impact within local economies. Gail Adams, one of our associates travelled to Egypt last summer for a vacation and enjoyed it immensely and would return to Egypt tomorrow for another one.
Nova Scotia-developed curriculum is used in Cairo and Alexandria, Cape Breton University has a campus in Cairo, the College of the North Atlantic has a campus in Qatar and there is an EduNova Gulf office located in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. A large contingent of students from the Middle East attends educational institutions throughout Atlantic Canada.
Atlantic Canada, and Halifax in particular, has benefitted from a steady stream of immigrants from the Middle East, especially Lebanon over the longer term and more recently from Egypt. Continued unrest will create an impetus for enhanced immigration from the region while the adoption of democracy in countries such as Egypt may create an environment whereby residents will choose to stay in their homeland.
What to do? It is all about operating in a world of change and prioritizing our activities to optimize positive outcomes.
1) Risk Mitigation
- We all need to look at our operating plans, budgets and people with an eye to the impact Middle East in turmoil may have on us.
- Many of us have already taken steps to reduce energy costs but we need to consider what would happen if the price of oil was to leap 50%.
- What kind of support can we give those who have family in areas undergoing significant turmoil?
2) Seize the Opportunities
- Change creates opportunity.
- We know that we are going to face significant labour shortages in the future. Do we have opportunity to welcome immigrants from the Middle East into our businesses and communities? Look around at the very successful entrepreneurs who emigrated from the Middle East and have had a significant impact on Atlantic Canada .
- Imagine a free enterprise Egypt and what a market it might be for our goods and services.
More to come …
The Canada Games, the largest sporting event in the history of Halifax is upon us. We’re very proud to be part of this historic moment in our community. We’re especially proud of the contribution that Ruth Blades, a member of our team, has made over the past 18 months.
Ruth recognized that this is “one of those events that come around once in a lifetime” and she wanted to be part of it. As a project manager in her professional life, she knew she had skills that could contribute to the success of the Games. Many months ago, she submitted her name and was asked to take on the co-project manager’s role with the Sport Division of the Games. I asked Ruth a few questions about her involvement and experience and here’s what she shared with me:
Q: What was involved in your role as Co-Project Manager of the Sport Division?
A: We developed the project plan, including project charters, work breakdown structures, risk assessments, issues tracking, reporting mechanisms and status reporting for the Project Management Office. That meant that we worked with the 21 Sport Organizing Committees, the Sport Management Group and other divisions to ensure that the field of play was set for all the participating sports. That includes all manner of things to make certain the events run smoothly such as: having equipment in the right place at the right time; officials in place and trained; competition and practice schedules developed down to the last detail; and a results system that is operational. In other words, our job was to make sure the Committees that were responsible for the execution of these activities knew what they had to do when and we kept them on track by checking in through regular status meetings.
Q: How much time have you committed to the Games?
A: So far I have spent about 250 hours over 18 months and I’m scheduled to work another 80 hours or so over the next two weeks. As we moved from planning into execution, I was asked to take on the role of Sport Division representative on the Arrival and Departures team. This group has developed plans and processes to ensure the athletes and their baggage arrive at the appropriate destinations. During the Games I will also be working as a Major Officials Information Desk Host, providing assistance to Major Officials and Technical Representatives.
Q: In total, you will have spent the equivalent of almost two working months on this volunteer effort. What have you learned?
A: I learned a lot about sport, especially the complexity of hosting 23 national championships at the same time. I also had a unique opportunity to learn about working within a large, complex and very public project that involves many stakeholders and participants. At Halifax Global, our projects tend to be much smaller in scale and are generally of interest only to our clients, their immediate stakeholders and us. The Canada Games are very public and the impact is huge.
Q: What is the single most important learning you will take away from this experience, the Games aside?
A: Well, I have absolutely enjoyed working with my colleagues on this project. It exposed me to a whole new group of people and a subject area I didn’t know much about. Probably the biggest learning for me is how important it is to communicate clearly and concisely in complex environments. We always talk about the importance of communication but to see it actually work in a project of this size and complexity was a valuable lesson for me.
Q: Why do you think the Games are important for Nova Scotia?
A: There are many reasons why the Games are important to us as Nova Scotians. They promote sport and a healthy life style, they allow the Province to demonstrate leadership in the delivery of sporting events, they will bring in additional revenue to the Province but I think the single biggest impact will be from the residual effects they leave behind. They will leave a fabulous legacy including the Canada Games Centre, significantly improved infrastructure at sport facilities, the training of major and minor officials, and sport equipment which will be used to train emerging and future athletes.
Q: What will you take away personally from your involvement with the Games?
A: The personal satisfaction of knowing that I helped, in a small way, to bring about these wonderful games. This is a big accomplishment for Halifax and I am proud to be one of the thousands of volunteers that made it happen.
All of us at Halifax Global are proud of Ruth and her contribution to the Games and we look forward to cheering on our athletes over the next couple of weeks. Well done, Ruth!